The matchAwaiting resultUpset
French Open: Matteo Berrettini vs Matteo Arnaldi
M. Berrettini 5 2 Italy M. Arnaldi 7 5 MatteoBerrettini MatteoArnaldi 4 Aces 1 1 Double faults 3 64% First serve % 66% 59% Win % on 1st serve 65% 37% Win % on 2nd serve 69% 3/3 Break points 5/15 0 Tiebreaks won 0 21 Receiving points won 43 65 Points won 78 7 Games won 12 3 Max games won in a row 4 7 Max points won in a row 6 44 Service points won 35 4 Service games won 7
VoxPop gap highlight
Will Berrettini win by 2 or more sets?
67%Crowd
50%Market
+17Divergence

+17 ppts divergence with the market.

The crowd are calling Yes on will berrettini win by 2 or more sets.

QuestionMarketCrowdGap
1Will Berrettini win by 2 or more sets?Biggest gap50%67% Yes+17
2Will the match have 37 or more total games?50%60% Yes+10
3Who wins the match?63%71% Matteo Berrettini+8
4Will the match go 4 or more sets?63%68% Yes+5
5Who wins the first set?58%59% Berrettini+1
The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.
Detailed match data
The crowd's read
Top scenario16%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters553World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Who wins the match?
Matteo Berrettini71%
Matteo Arnaldi29%
OutcomeMatteo Arnaldi
Voters553
ReadUpset
2Who wins the first set?
Berrettini59%
Arnaldi41%
OutcomeArnaldi
Voters553
ReadUpset
3Will the match go 4 or more sets?
Yes68%
No32%
OutcomeNo
Voters553
ReadUpset
4Will Berrettini win by 2 or more sets?
Yes67%
No33%
OutcomeNo
Voters553
ReadMarket
5Will the match have 37 or more total games?
Yes60%
No40%
OutcomeNo
Voters553
ReadUpset
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Who wins the match: Matteo BerrettiniUpset
Mkt 63%Crowd 71%+8pp
Result: Matteo Arnaldi · 1.01
: Deep
Who wins the first set: BerrettiniUpset
Mkt 58%Crowd 59%+1pp
Result: Arnaldi · 0.70
: Thin
Will the match go 4 or more sets: YesUpset
Mkt 63%Crowd 68%+5pp
Result: No · 0.92
: Thin
Will Berrettini win by 2 or more sets: YesMarket
Mkt 50%Crowd 67%+17pp
Result: No · 0.90
: Thin
Will the match have 37 or more total games: YesUpset
Mkt 50%Crowd 60%+10pp
Result: No · 0.72
: Thin
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Who wins the match1.01
Who wins the first set0.70
Will the match go 4 or more sets0.92
Will Berrettini win by 2 or more sets0.90
Will the match have 37 or more total games0.72
Average0.85
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
VoxPop top scenarios
32% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 553 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosWho wins the match?Who wins the first set?Will the match go 4 or more sets?Will Berrettini win by 2 or more sets?Will the match have 37 or more total games?
116%88 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
BerrettiniGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
1.4×
29%50 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
BerrettiniGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
1.2×
37%40 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
ArnaldiCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
0.9×
46%33 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
BerrettiniGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
1.7×
55%27 voters
Matteo ArnaldiCalled it!
ArnaldiCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
1.5×
65%26 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
BerrettiniGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
0.8×
74%22 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
BerrettiniGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
0.7×
83%19 voters
Matteo ArnaldiCalled it!
BerrettiniGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
0.7×
93%18 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
ArnaldiCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
0.8×
103%18 voters
Matteo BerrettiniGot it wrong
ArnaldiCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
0.6×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (553 voters · top 10 of 32 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.16How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.4×The most-backed combination drew 1.4× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-6The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-6; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-9. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.
VoxPop
Our insights are a read-only record of what our World ID holders expressed in our polls, not VoxPop predictions. The crowd's read is not to be considered financial advice.
Get the calls worth watching