26 J. Menšík 6 6 77 Brazil 28 J. Fonseca 4 3 63 JakubMenšík JoaoFonseca 11 Aces 6 4 Double faults 4 65% First serve % 72% 83% Win % on 1st serve 62% 35% Win % on 2nd serve 63% 5/21 Break points 2/5 1 Tiebreaks won 0 51 Receiving points won 35 117 Points won 111 19 Games won 13 3 Max games won in a row 3 8 Max points won in a row 7 66 Service points won 76 13 Service games won 11
Crowd called 1 of 5 legs; market called 2.
VoxPop gap highlight
Will the match go 5 or more sets?
60%Crowd
25%Market
+35Divergence
+35 ppts divergence with the market.
The crowd called Yes on will the match go 5 or more sets.
QuestionMarketCrowdGap
1Will the match go 5 or more sets?Biggest gap25%60% Yes+35
2Who wins the match?35%62% Jakub Mensik+27
3Will the match have 39 or more total games?48%67% Yes+19
4Will Fonseca win by 2 or more sets?52%60% Yes+8
5Who wins the first set?59%56% Fonseca-3
How it landed:Crowd beat the market26 J. Menšík 6 6 77 Brazil 28 J. Fonseca 4 3 63 JakubMenšík JoaoFonseca 11 Aces 6 4 Double faults 4 65% First serve % 72% 83% Win % on 1st serve 62% 35% Win % on 2nd serve 63% 5/21 Break points 2/5 1 Tiebreaks won 0 51 Receiving points won 35 117 Points won 111 19 Games won 13 3 Max games won in a row 3 8 Max points won in a row 7 66 Service points won 76 13 Service games won 11 — full per-leg reconciliation below.
The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.
Detailed match data
How the crowd called it
1 / 5questions the crowd called · 2 surprises
wins the matchCrowd beat the market
the match have 39 or…Market beat the crowd
the match go 5 or more…Market beat the crowd
Fonseca win by 2 or…Surprise
wins the first setSurprise
The crowd's read
Top scenario10%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters165World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Who wins the match?
Jakub Mensik ✓62%
Joao Fonseca38%
OutcomeJakub Mensik
Voters165
ReadCrowd
2Will the match have 39 or more total games?
Yes67%
No ✓33%
OutcomeNo
Voters165
ReadMarket
3Will the match go 5 or more sets?
Yes60%
No ✓40%
OutcomeNo
Voters165
ReadMarket
4Will Fonseca win by 2 or more sets?
Yes60%
No ✓40%
OutcomeNo
Voters165
ReadUpset
5Who wins the first set?
Fonseca56%
Mensik ✓44%
OutcomeMensik
Voters165
ReadUpset
Crowd vs market · every leg
How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.
Who wins the match: Jakub MensikCrowd
Mkt 35%Crowd 62%+27pp
Result: Jakub Mensik · 0.29
: Deep
Will the match have 39 or more total games: YesMarket
Mkt 48%Crowd 67%+19pp
Result: No · 0.90
: Thin
Will the match go 5 or more sets: YesMarket
Mkt 25%Crowd 60%+35pp
Result: No · 0.72
: Thin
Will Fonseca win by 2 or more sets: YesUpset
Mkt 52%Crowd 60%+8pp
Result: No · 0.72
: Deep
Who wins the first set: FonsecaUpset
Mkt 59%Crowd 56%-3pp
Result: Mensik · 0.63
: Thin
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Who wins the match0.29
Will the match have 39 or more total games0.90
Will the match go 5 or more sets0.72
Will Fonseca win by 2 or more sets0.72
Who wins the first set0.63
Average0.65
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
VoxPop top scenarios
28% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 165 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios
★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).
The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosWho wins the match?Will the match have 39 or more total games?Will the match go 5 or more sets?Will Fonseca win by 2 or more sets?Who wins the first set?
110%16 voters
Jakub MensikCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
MensikCalled it!
1.5×
210%16 voters
Joao FonsecaGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
FonsecaGot it wrong
1.9×
38%14 voters
Jakub MensikCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
MensikCalled it!
1.9×
46%10 voters
Jakub MensikCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
FonsecaGot it wrong
1.1×
55%8 voters
Joao FonsecaGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
FonsecaGot it wrong
1.4×
65%8 voters
Jakub MensikCalled it!
NoCalled it!
NoCalled it!
NoCalled it!
FonsecaGot it wrong
2.6×
75%8 voters
Jakub MensikCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
FonsecaGot it wrong
0.9×
84%7 voters
Joao FonsecaGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
MensikCalled it!
1.1×
94%7 voters
Jakub MensikCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
FonsecaGot it wrong
0.5×
104%7 voters
Joao FonsecaGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
FonsecaGot it wrong
2.5×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (165 voters · top 10 of 32 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.24How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.5×The most-backed combination drew 1.5× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-10The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-10; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-15. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
How right was the crowd · alignment
5 / 54 · 2%
4 / 523 · 14%
3 / 538 · 23%
2 / 552 · 32%
1 / 532 · 19%
0 / 516 · 10%
Legs each complete ballot got right (n=165). Average 2.19 / 5.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.
Our insights are a read-only record of what our World ID holders expressed in our polls, not VoxPop predictions. The crowd's read is not to be considered financial advice.