The matchAwaiting resultUpset
French Open: Anna Kalinskaya vs Maja Chwalinska
A. Kalinskaya 63 3 Poland M. Chwalinska 77 6 AnnaKalinskaya MajaChwalińska 1 Aces 0 6 Double faults 1 68% First serve % 80% 51% Win % on 1st serve 51% 33% Win % on 2nd serve 57% 5/11 Break points 7/8 0 Tiebreaks won 1 37 Receiving points won 43 69 Points won 82 9 Games won 13 4 Max games won in a row 5 5 Max points won in a row 8 32 Service points won 39 4 Service games won 5
VoxPop gap highlight
Will Kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets?
72%Crowd
30%Market
+42Divergence

+42 ppts divergence with the market.

The crowd are calling Yes on will kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets.

QuestionMarketCrowdGap
1Will Kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets?Biggest gap30%72% Yes+42
2Will the match go 3 or more sets?40%69% Yes+29
3Who wins the match?51%78% Anna Kalinskaya+27
4Will the match have 23 or more total games?44%63% Yes+19
5Who wins the first set?50%56% Kalinskaya+6
The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.
Detailed match data
The crowd's read
Top scenario16%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters590World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Who wins the match?
Anna Kalinskaya78%
Maja Chwalinska22%
OutcomeMaja Chwalinska
Voters590
ReadUpset
2Who wins the first set?
Kalinskaya56%
Chwalinska44%
OutcomeChwalinska
Voters590
ReadUpset
3Will the match have 23 or more total games?
Yes63%
No37%
OutcomeNo
Voters590
ReadMarket
4Will Kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets?
Yes72%
No28%
OutcomeNo
Voters590
ReadMarket
5Will the match go 3 or more sets?
Yes69%
No31%
OutcomeNo
Voters590
ReadMarket
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Who wins the match: Anna KalinskayaUpset
Mkt 51%Crowd 78%+27pp
Result: Maja Chwalinska · 1.22
: Deep
Who wins the first set: KalinskayaUpset
Mkt 50%Crowd 56%+6pp
Result: Chwalinska · 0.63
: Thin
Will the match have 23 or more total games: YesMarket
Mkt 44%Crowd 63%+19pp
Result: No · 0.79
: Thin
Will Kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets: YesMarket
Mkt 30%Crowd 72%+42pp
Result: No · 1.04
: Thin
Will the match go 3 or more sets: YesMarket
Mkt 40%Crowd 69%+29pp
Result: No · 0.95
: Thin
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Who wins the match1.22
Who wins the first set0.63
Will the match have 23 or more total games0.79
Will Kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets1.04
Will the match go 3 or more sets0.95
Average0.93
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
VoxPop top scenarios
33% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 590 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosWho wins the match?Who wins the first set?Will the match have 23 or more total games?Will Kalinskaya win by 2 or more sets?Will the match go 3 or more sets?
116%93 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
KalinskayaGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
1.2×
210%58 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
ChwalinskaCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
0.9×
38%46 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
KalinskayaGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
1.0×
46%34 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
KalinskayaGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
0.9×
56%34 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
ChwalinskaCalled it!
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
0.9×
65%32 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
KalinskayaGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
1.0×
75%31 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
KalinskayaGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
1.5×
85%29 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
ChwalinskaCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
1.2×
94%22 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
ChwalinskaCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
0.8×
104%21 voters
Anna KalinskayaGot it wrong
ChwalinskaCalled it!
NoCalled it!
YesGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
1.3×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (590 voters · top 10 of 32 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.09How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.2×The most-backed combination drew 1.2× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-6The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-6; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-7. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.
VoxPop
Our insights are a read-only record of what our World ID holders expressed in our polls, not VoxPop predictions. The crowd's read is not to be considered financial advice.
Get the calls worth watching