All resolved pollsResolved · 27 OCT 2026Crowd & market agreed
RomaWon · Crowd had 78%4
CagliariCrowd had 13%2
The verdict

The crowd backed Yes. Roma won 4–2.

AS Roma vs Cagliari 565 verified humans answered. The crowd's read sat 20 points above the market's price on Yes, and it went the other way.

65%Crowd on Yes
45%Market price
+20Points of divergence

The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.

Detailed match data
How the crowd called it
3 / 3questions the crowd called · 2 alongside the market
Match resultCrowd & market agreed
there be more than 2.5…Crowd & market agreed
both teams scoreCrowd beat the market
The crowd's read
Top scenario39%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters565World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Match result
Roma ✓78%
Cagliari13%
Tie9%
OutcomeRoma
Voters565
ReadConsensus
2Will there be more than 2.5 goals?
Over 2.5 goals ✓59%
Under 2.5 goals41%
OutcomeOver 2.5 goals
Voters565
ReadConsensus
3Will both teams score?
Yes ✓65%
No35%
OutcomeYes
Voters565
ReadCrowd
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Match result: RomaConsensus
Mkt 73%Crowd 78%+5pp
Result: Roma · 0.07
: Deep
Will there be more than 2.5 goals: Over 2.5 goalsConsensus
Mkt 55%Crowd 59%+4pp
Result: Over 2.5 goals · 0.34
: Deep
Will both teams score: YesCrowd
Mkt 45%Crowd 65%+20pp
Result: Yes · 0.24
: Thin
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Match result0.07
Will there be more than 2.5 goals0.34
Will both teams score0.24
Average0.22
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
VoxPop top scenarios
Scenario 1 · 39% of voters · came true

The crowd's dominant vision: Roma in control of an open, end-to-end game where both sides find the net in a free-scoring affair.

Match resultRoma
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Over 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?Yes
Scenario 2 · 16% of voters

A tighter, more cautious picture: Roma grind out a narrow win, keeping Cagliari off the board in a low-tempo, defensively solid contest.

Match resultRoma
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Under 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?No
Scenario 3 · 13% of voters

A compact but two-way match: Roma win despite both sides scoring, with the game staying tight and chances at a premium throughout.

Match resultRoma
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Under 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?Yes
68% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 565 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosMatch resultWill there be more than 2.5 goals?Will both teams score?
139%220 voters
RomaCalled it!
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
YesCalled it!
1.3×
216%93 voters
RomaCalled it!
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.5×
313%72 voters
RomaCalled it!
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
0.6×
410%57 voters
RomaCalled it!
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
NoGot it wrong
0.6×
55%29 voters
CagliariGot it wrong
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
YesCalled it!
1.0×
63%19 voters
CagliariGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.8×
73%18 voters
TieGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
1.3×
83%16 voters
TieGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
2.2×
92%14 voters
CagliariGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
0.7×
102%13 voters
TieGot it wrong
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
YesCalled it!
0.7×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (565 voters · top 10 of 12 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.18How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.3×The most-backed combination drew 1.3× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-3The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-3; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-3. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
How right was the crowd · alignment
3 / 3220 · 39%
2 / 3171 · 30%
1 / 3139 · 25%
0 / 335 · 6%
Legs each complete ballot got right (n=565). Average 2.02 / 3.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.
Browse all matches