All resolved pollsResolved · 10 SEPT 2026Crowd & market agreed
ComoWon · Crowd had 41%4
RB Leipzig1
The verdict

The crowd backed Under 2.5 goals. Como won 4–1.

Como vs RB Leipzig 574 verified humans answered. The crowd's read sat 21 points above the market's price on Under 2.5 goals, and it went the other way.

60%Crowd on Under 2.5 goals
39%Market price
+21Points of divergence

The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.

Detailed match data
How the crowd called it
2 / 3questions the crowd called · 2 alongside the market
Match resultCrowd & market agreed
there be more than 2.5…Market beat the crowd
both teams scoreCrowd & market agreed
The crowd's read
Top scenario15%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters574World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Match result
Como ✓41%
Leipzig39%
Tie21%
OutcomeComo
Voters574
ReadConsensus
2Will there be more than 2.5 goals?
Under 2.5 goals60%
Over 2.5 goals ✓40%
OutcomeOver 2.5 goals
Voters574
ReadMarket
3Will both teams score?
Yes ✓61%
No39%
OutcomeYes
Voters574
ReadConsensus
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Match result: ComoConsensus
Mkt 53%Crowd 41%-12pp
Result: Como · 0.54
: Deep
Will there be more than 2.5 goals: Under 2.5 goalsMarket
Mkt 39%Crowd 60%+21pp
Result: Over 2.5 goals · 0.72
: Deep
Will both teams score: YesConsensus
Mkt 63%Crowd 61%-2pp
Result: Yes · 0.30
: Deep
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Match result0.54
Will there be more than 2.5 goals0.72
Will both teams score0.30
Average0.52
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
VoxPop top scenarios
Scenario 1 · 15% of voters · came true

A lively home win: Como take the points in an open, end-to-end game where both sides find the net and goals flow freely.

Match resultComo
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Over 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?Yes
Scenario 2 · 13% of voters

Leipzig overturn the odds in a high-scoring, mutually punishing contest, both teams contributing to a goal-laden away victory.

Match resultLeipzig
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Over 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?Yes
Scenario 3 · 13% of voters

Leipzig grind out a tight, controlled win, keeping Como off the scoresheet in a low-event, defensively disciplined match.

Match resultLeipzig
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Under 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?No
41% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 574 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosMatch resultWill there be more than 2.5 goals?Will both teams score?
115%88 voters
ComoCalled it!
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
YesCalled it!
1.5×
213%77 voters
LeipzigGot it wrong
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
YesCalled it!
1.4×
313%72 voters
LeipzigGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.4×
411%64 voters
ComoCalled it!
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.2×
511%64 voters
ComoCalled it!
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
0.7×
69%53 voters
LeipzigGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
0.6×
79%51 voters
TieGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
1.2×
87%42 voters
TieGot it wrong
Under 2.5 goalsGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.5×
94%21 voters
LeipzigGot it wrong
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
NoGot it wrong
0.6×
103%17 voters
ComoCalled it!
Over 2.5 goalsCalled it!
NoGot it wrong
0.5×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (574 voters · top 10 of 12 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.18How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.5×The most-backed combination drew 1.5× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-7The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-7; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-10. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
How right was the crowd · alignment
3 / 388 · 15%
2 / 3173 · 30%
1 / 3199 · 35%
0 / 3114 · 20%
Legs each complete ballot got right (n=574). Average 1.41 / 3.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.
Browse all matches