All resolved pollsResolved · 24 AUG 2026Crowd & market agreed
FulhamCrowd had 12%2
ChelseaWon · Crowd had 80%3
The verdict

The crowd called it — Chelsea won 2–3.

Fulham vs Chelsea: three calls on one match 709 verified humans answered. The crowd's read sat 30 points above the market's price on Chelsea, and the crowd had it.

80%Crowd on Chelsea
50%Market price
+30Points of divergence

The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.

Detailed match data
How the crowd called it
3 / 3questions the crowd called · 3 alongside the market
Fulham vs Chelsea: what…Crowd & market agreed
there be three goals or…Crowd & market agreed
both sides find the netCrowd & market agreed
The crowd's read
Top scenario37%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters709World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Fulham vs Chelsea: what is the result?
Chelsea80%
Fulham12%
Tie8%
OutcomeChelsea
Voters709
ReadConsensus
2Will there be three goals or more?
Over 2.558%
Under 2.542%
OutcomeOver 2.5
Voters709
ReadConsensus
3Do both sides find the net?
Yes68%
No32%
OutcomeYes
Voters709
ReadConsensus
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Fulham vs Chelsea: what is the result: ChelseaConsensus
Mkt 50%Crowd 80%+30pp
Result: Chelsea · 0.06
: Deep
Will there be three goals or more: Over 2.5Consensus
Mkt 58%Crowd 58%0pp
Result: Over 2.5 · 0.35
: Deep
Do both sides find the net: YesConsensus
Mkt 61%Crowd 68%+7pp
Result: Yes · 0.20
: Deep
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Fulham vs Chelsea: what is the result0.06
Will there be three goals or more0.35
Do both sides find the net0.20
Average0.21
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
VoxPop top scenarios
Scenario 1 · 37% of voters · came true

A Chelsea win in an open, end-to-end match where both sides contribute to a goal-heavy afternoon. The crowd's dominant vision, clustering well above what independent answers alone

Fulham vs Chelsea: what is the result?Chelsea
Will there be three goals or more?Over 2.5
Do both sides find the net?Yes
Scenario 2 · 18% of voters

Chelsea take the points in a tighter contest, both teams finding the net but the match staying narrow and contained. A quieter Chelsea win where quality edges out volume.

Fulham vs Chelsea: what is the result?Chelsea
Will there be three goals or more?Under 2.5
Do both sides find the net?Yes
Scenario 3 · 13% of voters

Chelsea grind out a clean, low-scoring victory, keeping Fulham off the scoresheet in a disciplined, shutout-flavoured win. Compact and controlled, with Chelsea doing just enough.

Fulham vs Chelsea: what is the result?Chelsea
Will there be three goals or more?Under 2.5
Do both sides find the net?No
69% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 709 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosFulham vs Chelsea: what is the result?Will there be three goals or more?Do both sides find the net?
137%264 voters
ChelseaCalled it!
Over 2.5Called it!
YesCalled it!
1.2×
218%127 voters
ChelseaCalled it!
Under 2.5Got it wrong
YesCalled it!
0.8×
313%95 voters
ChelseaCalled it!
Under 2.5Got it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.2×
411%81 voters
ChelseaCalled it!
Over 2.5Called it!
NoGot it wrong
0.8×
54%27 voters
FulhamGot it wrong
Over 2.5Called it!
YesCalled it!
0.8×
64%26 voters
FulhamGot it wrong
Under 2.5Got it wrong
YesCalled it!
1.1×
73%23 voters
TieGot it wrong
Under 2.5Got it wrong
YesCalled it!
1.4×
82%16 voters
FulhamGot it wrong
Under 2.5Got it wrong
NoGot it wrong
1.4×
92%16 voters
TieGot it wrong
Over 2.5Called it!
YesCalled it!
0.7×
102%13 voters
FulhamGot it wrong
Over 2.5Called it!
NoGot it wrong
0.8×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (709 voters · top 10 of 12 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.11How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.2×The most-backed combination drew 1.2× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-3The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-3; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-3. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
How right was the crowd · alignment
3 / 3264 · 37%
2 / 3251 · 35%
1 / 3167 · 24%
0 / 327 · 4%
Legs each complete ballot got right (n=709). Average 2.06 / 3.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.