All resolved pollsAwaiting result
Venezia
Inter Milan
Closed
VoxPop gap highlight
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?
61%Crowd
73%Market
-12Divergence

-12 ppts divergence with the market.

Crowd sits well below the market on Over 2.5 goals, the widest gap in the poll.

QuestionMarketCrowdGap
1Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Biggest gap73%61% Over 2.5 goals-12
2Match result75%75% Inter0
3Will both teams score?60%60% Yes0
The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.
Detailed match data
The crowd's read
Top scenario34%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters574World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Match result
Inter75%
Venezia15%
Tie10%
OutcomeNot yet resolved
Voters574
2Will there be more than 2.5 goals?
Over 2.5 goals61%
Under 2.5 goals39%
OutcomeNot yet resolved
Voters574
3Will both teams score?
Yes60%
No40%
OutcomeNot yet resolved
Voters574
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Match result: Inter
Mkt 75%Crowd 75%0pp
: Thin
Will there be more than 2.5 goals: Over 2.5 goals
Mkt 73%Crowd 61%-12pp
: Thin
Will both teams score: Yes
Mkt 60%Crowd 60%0pp
: Thin
VoxPop top scenarios
Scenario 1 · 34% of voters

Inter control the match but it opens up, with both sides finding the net in a lively, multi-goal contest that rewards attacking intent from both teams.

Match resultInter
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Over 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?Yes
Scenario 2 · 16% of voters

Inter grind out a disciplined, low-key win, keeping Venezia off the scoresheet in a tight, contained affair with few clear chances at either end.

Match resultInter
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Under 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?No
Scenario 3 · 15% of voters

Inter run up the scoring without reply, goals flowing freely but all in one direction as Venezia fail to register in a one-sided, open game.

Match resultInter
Will there be more than 2.5 goals?Over 2.5 goals
Will both teams score?No
66% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 574 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosMatch resultWill there be more than 2.5 goals?Will both teams score?
134%197 voters
InterPending
Over 2.5 goalsPending
YesPending
1.3×
216%92 voters
InterPending
Under 2.5 goalsPending
NoPending
1.4×
315%87 voters
InterPending
Over 2.5 goalsPending
NoPending
0.8×
49%54 voters
InterPending
Under 2.5 goalsPending
YesPending
0.5×
56%32 voters
VeneziaPending
Over 2.5 goalsPending
YesPending
1.0×
65%31 voters
TiePending
Under 2.5 goalsPending
YesPending
2.3×
73%18 voters
VeneziaPending
Under 2.5 goalsPending
YesPending
0.9×
83%17 voters
VeneziaPending
Over 2.5 goalsPending
NoPending
0.8×
93%17 voters
VeneziaPending
Under 2.5 goalsPending
NoPending
1.3×
102%12 voters
TiePending
Under 2.5 goalsPending
NoPending
1.3×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (574 voters · top 10 of 12 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.16How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.3×The most-backed combination drew 1.3× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-3The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-3; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-4. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.