All resolved pollsAwaiting result
Universidad Católica
Universidad de Chile
Closed
VoxPop gap highlight
Match result
41%Crowd
39%Market
+2Divergence

+2 ppts divergence with the market.

Crowd above market on Universidad de Chile win, the poll's clearest divergence point.

QuestionMarketCrowdGap
1Match resultBiggest gap39%41% CF Universidad de Chile+2
The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.
Detailed match data
The crowd's read
Top scenario41%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters537World ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Match result
CF Universidad de Chile41%
CD Universidad Católica36%
Tie23%
OutcomeNot yet resolved
Voters537
Crowd vs market · every leg

How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.

Match result: CF Universidad de Chile
Mkt 39%Crowd 41%+2pp
: Thin
VoxPop top scenarios
Scenario 1 · 41% of voters

The crowd's most-backed vision: Universidad de Chile take the Clásico, a read that sits fractionally above where the market prices that outcome.

Match resultCF Universidad de Chile
Scenario 2 · 36% of voters

A strong minority of the crowd sees Católica claiming the derby, clustering just behind the top scenario in a tightly contested result map.

Match resultCD Universidad Católica
Scenario 3 · 23% of voters

Roughly one in four voters picture the Clásico ending level, the least-backed of the three visions but still a meaningful slice of the crowd's collective read.

Match resultTie
100% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 537 voters
The crowd's map · top scenarios

★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).

The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosMatch result
141%218 voters
CF Universidad de ChilePending
1.0×
236%194 voters
CD Universidad CatólicaPending
1.0×
323%125 voters
TiePending
1.0×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (537 voters · top 3 of 3 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.00How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.0×The most-backed combination drew 1.0× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-2The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-2; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-2. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.
Browse all matches