VoxPop top scenarios
48% of voters backed the top 3 scenarios · 1.2k voters
BelgiumCrowd's pick · 75%1
EgyptCrowd had 14%1
The verdict
Belgium 1–1 Egypt
Belgium vs. Egypt 1.2k verified humans answered. The crowd's read sat 20 points above the market's price on Yes, and it went the other way.
69%Crowd on Yes
49%Market price
+20Points of divergence
The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation; the crowd's read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.
Detailed match data
How the crowd called it
1 / 4questions the crowd called · 2 surprises
winsSurprise
there be 3 or more…Market beat the crowd
both teams scoreCrowd beat the market
leads at half-timeSurprise
The crowd's read
Top scenario27%share in the most-picked scenario
Cross-market correlationLowhow much answers moved together
Voters1.2kWorld ID voters
How the crowd voted per leg
1Who wins?
OutcomeDraw
Voters1.2k
ReadUpset
2Will there be 3 or more goals scored?
OutcomeNo
Voters1.2k
ReadMarket
3Will both teams score?
OutcomeYes
Voters1.2k
ReadCrowd
4Who leads at half-time?
OutcomeEgypt
Voters1.2k
ReadUpset
Crowd vs market · every leg
How the crowd's read sat against the betting price on every question. The market's a yardstick, not a call: Deep = liquid enough to trust, Thin = directional only.
The crowd's calibration · Brier
The crowd's calibration, question by question
Who wins1.37
Will there be 3 or more goals scored0.70
Will both teams score0.19
Who leads at half-time1.08
Average0.83
Brier scores how well-calibrated the crowd was on each question: 0 is a perfect, confident, correct call · ~0.25 is a coin-flip · higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened. Computed from the crowd's own vote split vs what actually happened — no betting market involved.
The crowd's map · top scenarios
★ = the cell that actually happened; ♥ = the crowd's most-backed. × is how much more the crowd clustered on a combination than answering each question independently predicts — a cross-leg correlation a per-leg market can't price (overall TV-distance Low).
The crowd's top scenariosJoint distribution
Crowd scenariosWho wins?Will there be 3 or more goals scored?Will both teams score?Who leads at half-time?
127%333 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
BelgiumGot it wrong
1.4×
212%140 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesCalled it!
BelgiumGot it wrong
0.9×
39%109 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
NoGot it wrong
BelgiumGot it wrong
1.5×
49%104 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
NoGot it wrong
BelgiumGot it wrong
1.0×
55%57 voters
EgyptGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
EgyptCalled it!
4.3×
63%41 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesCalled it!
DrawGot it wrong
0.8×
73%39 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
DrawGot it wrong
0.6×
83%38 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
YesGot it wrong
YesCalled it!
EgyptCalled it!
0.5×
93%35 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
NoGot it wrong
DrawGot it wrong
1.6×
102%26 voters
BelgiumGot it wrong
NoCalled it!
YesCalled it!
EgyptCalled it!
0.5×
Each row is one full scenario the crowd could pick, most-backed first (1.2k voters · top 10 of 36 combinations). vs ind. above 1× means the crowd clustered on that exact combination together.
0.23How far the crowd's whole picture sat from treating each question on its own. 0 = they answered independently; closer to 1 = the questions moved together.
Clustering on the top call1.4×The most-backed combination drew 1.4× as many voters as separate answers would predict — the crowd piled onto it together.
Rarity of the top call1-in-4The crowd put its top scenario at about 1-in-4; answering each question separately implies ~1-in-5. Shorter odds = more crowd conviction.
How right was the crowd · alignment
Legs each complete ballot got right (n=1.2k). Average 1.4 / 4.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes — never mid-vote. "Crowd called it" means the crowd's top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.