The crowd called it — Canada won 2–0.
Canada vs Peru 591 verified humans answered. Crowd on Canada: well above market price, and the result followed.
How the crowd voted
Where the crowd split from the market
The crowd was more confident in Canada than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.
What the crowd was thinking
The crowd's dominant vision: Canada controlling the contest and taking the result, backed by a clear majority of verified voters.
A meaningful minority saw Peru finding a way through, picturing the visitors as capable of turning the match in their favour.
A smaller cluster imagined neither side breaking the deadlock, with the points shared and the contest ending level.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.22
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.