The crowd called it — River Plate won 2–3.
Banfield vs River Plate: how does it end? 694 verified humans answered. Crowd above market on River Plate, well below on Tie. Both gaps aligned with the outcome.
How the crowd voted
Where the crowd split from the market
The crowd was more confident in River Plate than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.
What the crowd was thinking
The crowd's dominant vision: River Plate leaving with the points, backed by a clear majority of voters with little hesitation.
A meaningful minority held firm on a Banfield win at home, keeping that scenario alive on the collective map.
The crowd largely dismissed a share of the spoils, assigning it the thinnest slice of collective belief by a wide margin.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.25
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.