All resolved pollsResolved · 30 AUG 2026Crowd & market agreed
TolucaWon · Crowd had 48%4
Juárez0
The verdict

The crowd called it — Toluca won 4–0.

Toluca vs Juarez: how does it end? 670 verified humans answered. Crowd well below market on Toluca, spreading doubt the market barely priced, though Toluca won.

48%Crowd on Toluca
76%Market price
-28Points of divergence

How the crowd voted

670 verified humans · one human, one vote
TolucaWhat happened48%324 voters
Juarez33%221 voters
Tie19%125 voters
Toluca won, so 48% of the crowd called it. The market had Toluca at 76%.

Where the crowd split from the market

Market depth: deep
Market
76%
48%
Crowd
-28 ppts

The crowd was less confident in Toluca than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.

The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation. The crowd’s read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.

What the crowd was thinking

Scenario 1Came true
48%324 voters
Toluca

The crowd's plurality vision: Toluca control the match and take the points, though far fewer voters held this view than the market implied.

Scenario 2
33%221 voters
Juarez

A sizeable crowd contingent saw Juarez pulling off the upset, a scenario the market priced as a remote possibility but the crowd treated as a live one.

Scenario 3
19%125 voters
Tie

Nearly one in five voters pictured neither side breaking through, a stalemate outcome the crowd weighted more heavily than the market suggested.

How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.42
Brier score
0.42

0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.

Conviction
1-in-2

The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.

Ballots correct
324 of 670

Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.

Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.