Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto vs Atletico Tucuman: how does it end? 660 verified humans answered. Crowd piled into Rio Cuarto well above market; Tucuman won as the field's long shot landed.
The crowd was more confident in Rio Cuarto than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and it went against the result.
The crowd's dominant vision: a home win for Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto, backed by a clear majority and sitting far above where the market priced that outcome.
A minority of the crowd saw Atletico Tucuman leaving with the points, a read the market priced equally to the other two but the crowd treated as the least likely named winner.
The smallest slice of the crowd envisioned a stalemate, a scenario the market rated on par with the other outcomes but which the crowd collectively pushed to the bottom of its
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.