The crowd called it — Chelsea won 4–3.
Chelsea vs Brighton: how does it end? 702 verified humans answered. Crowd leaned Chelsea far harder than the market, Brighton left well below its market price.
How the crowd voted
Where the crowd split from the market
The crowd was more confident in Chelsea than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.
What the crowd was thinking
A dominant crowd conviction: most voters saw Chelsea controlling the outcome and taking all three points at Stamford Bridge.
A small but firm minority held that Brighton would travel well and leave with the win, well below what the market implied.
The fewest voters saw the sides cancelling each other out, a share the crowd placed far below the market's own draw estimate.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.08
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.