The crowd called it — Argentina won 4–0.
Argentina vs Bolivia 617 verified humans answered. No gap to speak of: crowd and market converged almost perfectly on every option.
How the crowd voted
What the crowd was thinking
An overwhelming consensus: the crowd saw Argentina as the clear and dominant force, leaving almost no room for doubt or dissent.
A small but present minority held out for Bolivia, imagining an upset that the vast bulk of the crowd considered a remote possibility.
The thinnest slice of the crowd envisioned a stalemate, a scenario almost entirely dismissed by the collective read of the 617 voters.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.02
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.