All resolved pollsResolved · 29 SEPT 2026Crowd & market agreed
AustraliaCrowd had 12%2
BrazilWon · Crowd had 77%4
The verdict

The crowd called it — Brazil won 2–4.

Australia vs Brazil 612 verified humans answered. Crowd leans harder on Brazil than the market does, while Tie is the clearest underweight.

77%Crowd on Brazil
73%Market price
+4Points of divergence

How the crowd voted

612 verified humans · one human, one vote
BrazilWhat happened77%469 voters
Australia12%72 voters
Tie12%71 voters
Brazil won, so 77% of the crowd called it. The market had Brazil at 73%.

Where the crowd split from the market

Market depth: deep
Market
73%
77%
Crowd
+4 ppts

The crowd was more confident in Brazil than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.

The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation. The crowd’s read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.

What the crowd was thinking

Scenario 1Came true
77%469 voters
Brazil

The crowd's dominant vision: Brazil in control from the off, with the overwhelming share of voters converging on a clear Brazilian result.

Scenario 2
12%72 voters
Australia

A small but firm minority picture: Australia causing an upset, holding their own and taking the points against the South American side.

Scenario 3
12%71 voters
Tie

An equally slim slice of the crowd imagined neither side pulling clear, the match ending level with honours shared.

How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.08
Brier score
0.08

0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.

Conviction
1-in-1

The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.

Ballots correct
469 of 612

Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.

Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.