The crowd backed CA Gimnasia y Esgrima de Mendoza. CA Platense won 1–2.
Gimnasia (Mendoza) vs Platense 549 verified humans answered. Crowd and market both underweighted Platense, but diverged sharply on Tie vs Gimnasia.
How the crowd voted
What the crowd was thinking
The crowd's plurality vision: home advantage holds, Gimnasia controls the contest and takes all three points on their own ground.
A minority but sizeable crowd vision: Platense travels well, disrupts Gimnasia's rhythm, and leaves with a surprise away victory.
The crowd's least favoured vision: neither side breaks through, tension cancels out ambition, and the points are shared.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.65
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.