The crowd backed Atlante. Tigres won 2–0.
Tigres UANL vs Atlante: how does it end? 657 verified humans answered. Crowd piled onto Atlante at a fraction of the market's implied chance, their top pick, opposite to what landed.
How the crowd voted
Where the crowd split from the market
The crowd was more confident in Atlante than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and it went against the result.
What the crowd was thinking
The crowd's plurality vision: Atlante pulling off the upset, a result the market treated as a distant long shot but voters made their top collective call.
A substantial crowd bloc saw Tigres winning at home, tracking the market's favourite but falling well short of the confidence the market assigned them.
A smaller crowd contingent envisioned neither side breaking through, a stalemate scenario the market priced similarly and voters placed last.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.62
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.