All resolved pollsResolved · 6 OCT 2026Crowd & market agreed
IndiaCrowd had 10%1
UruguayWon · Crowd had 84%6
The verdict

The crowd called it — Uruguay won 1–6.

India vs Uruguay 579 verified humans answered. Crowd below market on Uruguay, the one leg where the field leaned lighter than the price.

84%Crowd on Uruguay
87%Market price
-3Points of divergence

How the crowd voted

579 verified humans · one human, one vote
UruguayWhat happened84%485 voters
India10%57 voters
Tie6%37 voters
Uruguay won, so 84% of the crowd called it. The market had Uruguay at 87%.

Where the crowd split from the market

Market depth: deep
Market
87%
84%
Crowd
-3 ppts

The crowd was less confident in Uruguay than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.

The market price is a yardstick, not a recommendation. The crowd’s read is sentiment, not a prediction or financial advice.

What the crowd was thinking

Scenario 1Came true
84%485 voters
Uruguay

The crowd's overwhelming vision: Uruguay in control from the off, with the vast majority of voters seeing no other credible outcome.

Scenario 2
10%57 voters
India

A small but notable minority held firm on an India upset, picturing the hosts defying the odds in front of their own crowd.

Scenario 3
6%37 voters
Tie

The thinnest slice of the crowd imagined a stalemate, neither side pulling clear, with the contest ending level.

How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.04
Brier score
0.04

0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.

Conviction
1-in-1

The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.

Ballots correct
485 of 579

Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.

Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.