The crowd backed Tottenham. Tie won 0–0.
Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham: how does it end? 650 verified humans answered. Crowd on Tottenham: far above market, draw severely underweighted. And the draw landed.
How the crowd voted
Where the crowd split from the market
The crowd was more confident in Tottenham than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and it went against the result.
What the crowd was thinking
The dominant crowd vision: Tottenham leaving the City Ground with the points, backed by nearly two-thirds of all verified voters in a striking show of collective conviction.
A sizeable minority saw Forest holding their ground at home and taking the win, keeping the crowd's read from being a total one-way street.
The draw scenario was the crowd's clear blind spot, attracting only a thin slice of voters despite the market treating it as a live and meaningful possibility.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology1.30
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.