The crowd called it — CF Universidad de Chile won 6–0.
Universidad de Chile vs Ñublense 549 verified humans answered. Crowd underweights home win vs market, yet both converged on the same side.
How the crowd voted
Where the crowd split from the market
The crowd was less confident in CF Universidad de Chile than the betting price implied. That gap is the interesting part of this poll, and the crowd had it right.
What the crowd was thinking
The crowd's dominant vision: Universidad de Chile controlling the match at home, with nearly two-thirds of voters locking in a home victory as their single read.
A notable minority held a contrarian picture, seeing Ñublense pulling off an away result and defying the weight of crowd and market opinion alike.
A slim but real share of the crowd envisioned neither side breaking through, picturing a stalemate as the match's most likely neutral resolution.
How well calibrated was the crowd?Brier score, conviction and full methodology0.21
0 is a perfect confident call, 0.25 a coin flip. Higher means the crowd leaned away from what happened.
The odds the crowd’s own split implied for its top pick. Shorter odds mean more conviction.
Ballots whose pick matched the result. Computed from the crowd’s own vote split — no betting market involved.
Crowd sentiment is shown only after a poll closes, never mid-vote. “Crowd called it” means the crowd’s top pick matched the result; it is not a claim the crowd is right in general. Aggregate data from World ID voters — a crowd view, not a prediction or advice.